Taking out a loan to raise money for an investment is a well-used tactic for many Australians. In fact, borrowing to buy big ticket items is part of financial reality. How many of us could afford to buy a house out of our own pocket?
Borrowing funds will increase the amount you can have invested and naturally amplifies potential gains because there is a larger capital base on which to earn returns. The caveat in all this, of course, is that it can also magnify losses. If you’re using borrowed funds, and the investment makes a loss, you are still responsible for the interest on the loan as well as the principal of the loan itself.
A ‘geared’ investment is just another way of saying that the amount invested has been ratcheted up through getting a loan. The word ‘gearing’ can be understood in a similar way to how gears work on a bicycle – a mechanism that turns a small effort on the pedal into a bigger physical force on the wheel.
One of the basic principles of tax in Australia is that costs necessarily incurred in earning income are generally tax deductible. Where a loan is needed to buy an income-producing asset, the interest on the loan is tax deductible. Being able to claim such costs is not peculiar to Australia, and operates in the tax regimes of other countries such as the US, Britain and Canada as well.
And the same principle operates in the finance and investments sphere — the tax law allows you to deduct certain costs from your income that are incurred when borrowing money for investment, provided the investment has been made to produce assessable income. ‘Negative’ gearing comes about when earnings from an investment do not cover the costs associated with that investment.
Simply put, this is all negative gearing is – and is the reason why the concept of negative gearing can be so appealing for many investors, given that there are tax benefits for using someone else’s money. The strategy can also be used for investments other than property, such as shares or bonds.
Property is one investment area where negative gearing has been used to great effect.
For investment property, the ideal situation would be to make enough returns to cover loan repayments, plus interest, over the life of the loan. But what if some negative influences crop up? Say interest rates increase, or the tenants move out and leave you with no rent coming in. A longer-term concern would be the property losing value over the time you own it.
Should a loss be made on your investment property because its costs exceeds its income, the laws on negative gearing can step in and reduce the impact of that loss by allowing you to offset it against other income – in other words, you can take the loss off your assessable income to end up with a reduced income before tax is calculated. With investment property there are also allowable expenses to be deducted – rates, repairs, depreciation of assets and more (you can see more examples here).
By way of a simple example (and the following numbers are purely for demonstration), say an investor has a net salary, after tax deductions, of $50,000 and borrowed $102,000 at 10% interest a year to buy a property. Income from this investment property for the year comes in at $6,240 (which is after deductible expenses other than interest).
Taxable salary…………………………… $50,000
plus net rental receipts………………. $6,240
Total assessable income……………… $56,240
less interest deduction…………… ($10,200)
Taxable income………………………… $46,040
Tax payable (excluding Medicare)….. $7,362
The tax payable (excluding Medicare) on the $50,000 net salary without the negatively geared rental property would otherwise be $8,850, so the investor has paid $1,488 less tax. This case study applies the tax rates for the 2012 financial year.
But the ability to negatively gear needs to be kept in perspective as an aid to investment – a means to an end, not a goal in itself. The strategy is sound as long as the investment is also sound, and will over the long term give you a positive return. A good investment must eventually show a profit, and its merit should never hang only on its ability to garner a tax benefit.
Another thing to keep in mind is that for negative gearing to work, you must have other income from which to claim the tax benefit. This may seem obvious, but it’s worth stating – if all the income you have coming in centres on your geared investment, and you make a loss on it, there’s no way to turn that ‘negative’ into a positive.
Ideally, you should have confidence that the investment property will be worth much more in overall capital terms once you come to sell, and that it will be worthwhile to carry the losses in the meantime – with a little help from the tax benefits that negative gearing can give you.
One extra to keep in mind is that an asset held for more than 12 months should also get a 50% discount on capital gains tax (but check with your tax agent or accountant).
Critical points to consider before you take on an investment property are:
• Choose your investment property carefully, and try to make as sure as you can that it is an investment that is likely to increase in value.
• Make sure that you have sufficient financial reserves to cover any possible periods of having no rental income, and it may be wise to consider landlord insurance.
• You will also need to be able to cover occasional repairs or maintenance.
See your tax practitioner or accountant before making an investment decision to see if the negative gearing strategy will work for you.
Negative gearing for shares: A cautionary note
The concept of negative gearing works with other types of investments, although property may have more deductions available for your tax return.
With share-market investment, as the security over the loan can fluctuate in value (that is, the shares you buy can vary in value much more than a house, for example), the lender will generally limit the amount you are able to borrow to a certain percentage of the value of the share investment (expressed as a ‘loan-to-value ratio’ or LVR).
The added danger of gearing for the share-market, as demonstrated during the global financial crisis of recent times, is when the value of stocks falls below this LVR, resulting in dreaded ‘margin calls’. Investors are well advised to do some careful homework before committing too much to this share-market strategy.